Lustre User Group 2016: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
KenRawlings (talk | contribs) (fixing media url) |
KenRawlings (talk | contribs) (fixing state) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
LUG 2016 was held in Portland, Oregon | LUG 2016 was held in Portland, Oregon, from April 5th-7th, 2016 | ||
Day 1 – Tuesday, April 5 | Day 1 – Tuesday, April 5 | ||
Revision as of 14:02, 18 April 2016
LUG 2016 was held in Portland, Oregon, from April 5th-7th, 2016
Day 1 – Tuesday, April 5
- Welcome Remarks - Stephen Simms, LUG Program Chair
- Lustre 101: A Quick Overview - Stephen Simms, LUG Program Chair
- Community Release Update - Peter Jones, LWG Co-Chair
- Lustre 2.9 and Beyond - Andreas Dilger, Intel
- Improved Versioning, Building, Packaging, and Distribution of Lustre - Christopher Morrone, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Giuseppe Di Natale, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- LMT: It’s Only A Flesh Wound - Olaf Faaland, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- Enhancing Lustre Security with the Whitelist/Blacklist Patch - Josh Judd, Warp Mechanics
- Lustre Security Infrastructure Today and Tomorrow - John Hammond, Intel
- Security Isolation for Lustre - Sebastien Buisson, DDN
- Lustre Update from Seagate - Peter Bojanic, Seagate
- Large Streaming IO for Lustre on ZFS - Jinshan Xiong, Intel
- Lustre ZFS Snaphots - Fan Yong, Intel
- Vectorized ZFS RAIDZ Implementation - Gvozden Nešković, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies
- Status of the Upstream Client - James Simmons, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Removing Technical Debt - Ben Evans, Cray
- Intel(r) Solutions for Lustre* Software: Update - Jessica Popp, Intel
- Lustre.Org – A Community Resource - Ken Rawlings, Lustre.org Working Group OpenSFS Liaison
- OpenSFS and EOFS Update - Charlie Carroll, Cray, OpenSFS Board Member, Hugo Falter, EOFS Board Member
Day 2 – Wednesday, April 6
- Lustre in a Condo Computing Environment - John White, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- Lustre Deployed Three Different Ways to Meet Researchers’ Needs - Scott Yockel, Harvard University
- Tiering Storage (around Lustre) for Big Data and Supercomputing: Cray’s Portfolio of Offerings - Jason Goodman, Cray Inc.
- The 1 Million IOPS Lustre File System at TU Dresden - Michael Kluge, Technische Universität Dresden Johann Peyrard, Atos
- Building Lustre Solutions with NVM Devices Today - James Coomer, DataDirect Networks
- Lustre Deployment using Intel OmniPath Interconnect - Brian Johanson, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center J. Ray Scott, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
- InfiniBand At A Distance - Steve Woods, Cray, Dave McMillen, Cray
- Multi-rail LNet for Lustre - Amir Shehata, Intel Olaf Weber, SGI
- A New Approach to Lustre – Join HPE for a Look at the Future of Optimized Lustre Environments - Craig Belusar, Hewlett Packard Enterprise
- An Architecture for Docker on Lustre - Blake Caldwell, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Scaling Apache Spark on Lustre - Nicholas Chaimov, University of Oregon
- Scaling LDISKFS for the Future - Artem Blagodarenko, Seagate
- DL-SNAP: A Directory Level SNAPSHOT Facility on Lustre - Shinji Sumimoto, Fujitsu
- Board Q&A Panel
Day 3 – Thursday, April 7
- Developing an Open Source Object Storage Copytool for HSM on Lustre - Frederick Lefebvre, Calcul Québec Simon Guilbault, Calcul Québec
- Lustre Data Mover: Because File Systems are Rooted Trees and rsync Must Die - Rick Wagner, San Diego Supercomputer Center
- Project Quota for Lustre - Li Xi, DDN
- ASCAR: Increasing Performance Through Automated Contention Management - Yan Li, University of California, Santa Cruz
- Evaluating Progressive File Layouts for Lustre - Richard Mohr, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- Closing - Stephen Simms, LUG Program Chair